The Hidden Risk: When Organizational Knowledge Resides Outside the Organization
Knowledge risk management identifies and reduces threats to critical organizational knowledge, including knowledge created by suppliers and contractors. Clear ownership, regular knowledge transfer, and usable documentation help organizations maintain business continuity, reduce dependence on external parties, and retain knowledge when an engagement ends.

Organizational knowledge management aims to ensure that knowledge is available to employees at the place and time it is needed.
On the way to achieving this goal, the organization encounters many challenges, some of which are known as "knowledge risks."
Knowledge risk is a situation in which knowledge vital to the organization's business activity is unavailable, undocumented, may be lost, or not in the organization's possession at all.
When we carry out knowledge-needs mapping processes in an organization, two main knowledge-related risks usually come up.
Inaccessible knowledge – results from the lack of a clear methodology for storing and organizing knowledge, difficulty in locating it, or its being scattered across systems. This risk is typically addressed by implementing a document organization and management solution.
Undocumented knowledge – knowledge that exists in people's heads. Sometimes it is passed on as an oral tradition; sometimes employees leave, and the knowledge leaves with them. The main risk is the loss of unique knowledge that is difficult, if not impossible, to reconstruct without the employee who holds it. This risk is typically addressed through knowledge retention processes, in which the knowledge is documented and remains within the organization.
However, there is another issue, discussed and addressed less often, but no less "risky" – organizational knowledge that is not in the organization's possession.
This situation occurs when working with external companies and subcontractors, during which a great deal of knowledge is created outside the organization.
The absence of mechanisms for sharing and transferring this knowledge into the organization carries many risks, such as: lack of ownership and rights over the knowledge, dependency on external parties, harm to business continuity, inability to carry out developments and handle faults, leakage of knowledge to competitors, difficulty reusing the knowledge, and even complete loss of the knowledge in the event the engagement ends.
What can be done to reduce the risks?
Here are a few ideas:
Risk | Ways to Reduce / Prevent |
|---|---|
Lack of ownership and rights over the knowledge |
|
Dependency on external parties, harm to business continuity |
|
Inability to carry out developments and handle faults |
|
Leakage of knowledge to competitors |
|
Difficulty reusing the knowledge |
|
Complete loss of the knowledge in the event the engagement ends |
|
In summary:
Knowledge is an organizational asset, even when it is created outside the organization. This creates a unique risk: vital organizational knowledge that is outside the organization's control or reach.
In a world where working with external parties is integral to business activity, it is important to view knowledge retention and its transfer to the organization as a clear organizational interest.
To this end, the organization must create mechanisms and processes that ensure knowledge is transferred efficiently and with high quality, made accessible to employees, and reusable in the future.





Comments